Author Topic: Marine poser busted in a gigantic way  (Read 3053 times)

Offline Kodiak

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Staff Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 213
    • View Profile
Re: Marine poser busted in a gigantic way
« Reply #15 on: December 21, 2009, 10:55:49 AM »
Section 111 does apply to federal employees, and section 112 does apply to diplomats. Section 113, as I understand it, applies to everybody else.

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/7/113
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Ganef

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2103
    • View Profile
    • http://www.coyotetactical.blogspot.com/
Re: Marine poser busted in a gigantic way
« Reply #16 on: December 21, 2009, 01:36:17 PM »
Quote from: "Kodiak"
Section 111 does apply to federal employees, and section 112 does apply to diplomats. Section 113, as I understand it, applies to everybody else.

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/7/113

nope... you need to read over what makes an offense fall under federal vs. state criminal jurisdiction.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Well, ain\'t we a pair, Raggedy Man..."

Offline Kodiak

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Staff Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 213
    • View Profile
Re: Marine poser busted in a gigantic way
« Reply #17 on: December 21, 2009, 09:36:04 PM »
Nope... you need to read over what I'm saying.
 Assault would in most cases fall under the jurisdiction of a state, that is true. However, there still is a Federal law concerning assault on run-of-the-mill civilians. Jurisdiction technicalities don't negate its existence, and I'm merely stating the law exists (again, see section 113).
 If you do wish to discuss jurisdiction, then if the man is assaulted on Federal property, or is assaulted by any Federal employee, the case would indeed go to Federal courts as it would fall under Federal jurisdiction.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Bow-tie Assasin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant Major
  • *****
  • Posts: 501
    • View Profile
Re: Marine poser busted in a gigantic way
« Reply #18 on: December 21, 2009, 09:39:41 PM »
Im surprised Doc hasn't found this yet...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
"First There"
Never Quit!

Offline Kodiak

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Staff Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 213
    • View Profile
Re: Marine poser busted in a gigantic way
« Reply #19 on: December 21, 2009, 09:58:52 PM »
Is'nt he a lawyer? he'll probably make us all look like a bunch of morons...  :oops:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Vince

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • General
  • *****
  • Posts: 5230
    • View Profile
Re: Marine poser busted in a gigantic way
« Reply #20 on: December 21, 2009, 11:31:29 PM »
Kodiak - stick to relegating opinions rooted in experience and within your own lane.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »


"I was having dinner with Andrew Ho, and he said I should have COL McKnight lead airsofters in mock combat. I said, "That is the gayest idea I have ever heard." - John Lu

Offline Felipe AKA ACE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Staff Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 209
    • View Profile
Re: Marine poser busted in a gigantic way
« Reply #21 on: December 24, 2009, 11:22:08 PM »
Another one, not on federal level, but im sure that if someone wanted too, they could prosecute his ass. these two links are about the same douche, he starts out by saying that he wants to get rid of another poser in another forum and ask's for help, read on and see what happens :shock: .
links:
http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthr ... ost1463354

http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthr ... 2&page=all
Some pretty funny stuff in these two threads. good read.
-Felipe
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
ACE