Author Topic: I got an M1!  (Read 3059 times)

Offline Gantaliano Hoff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Brigadier General
  • *****
  • Posts: 1531
    • View Profile
    • http://www.amsog.com
(No subject)
« Reply #15 on: September 11, 2006, 01:57:21 PM »
Quote from: "Vince"
That's cool -- which club did you join to get that from CMP (I'm assuming from 'government armory' you mean Civilian Marksmanship)? I am looking to get my FFL 03 and join Garand Collectors and get myself one before they get too scarce.


I didn't need to join a club. I bought it through a friend, who's been a long time member of the CMP. I also got it within 30 days. Normally the waiting list is close to 90days because the CMP is getting fewer and fewer of them. But I got lucky. It also came in much better than average condition.

It cost me approx. 600. However, the value is going to go sky high in the next few years when springfield armory runs out.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Gantaliano Hoff »

Offline delta_echo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • First Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 473
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #16 on: September 11, 2006, 04:10:04 PM »
Quote from: "pilz"
Quote from: "Gantaliano Hoff"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXHGAXqFkz4

Here's a vid of my friend and I out shooting. He has an M1 as well...

Thats a really cool gun, was it hard to optain the WWII parts?


Very, very doubtful its completely WWII. The ask price of an all matching, non-rebarreled WWII M1 Garand is well into the thousands. The WWII garand shot a corrosive round through a non-chromed barrel. On top of that, besides many serving during the korean war, many of the rifles the CMP is selling currently were loaned to Greece. Thus, 99% have been rebarreled at some time. While you're far more likely to see a all original korean-era gun, they are pretty rare too. That being said, there is nothing wrong with a rifle thats been through the armory. Its a fine shooter a very neat piece of American history. I plan on picking up one of these through CMP sometime soon as well.

Oh, and yes the garand was the predecessor to the M14. The action is basically the same with a few upgrades. As for other differences, well, look 'em up.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by delta_echo »

Offline Raith

  • Wait, what?
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2289
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #17 on: September 11, 2006, 05:49:07 PM »
Quote from: "delta_echo"
Oh, and yes the garand was the predecessor to the M14.


And to the AK-47.  I always thought that was weird.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Raith »
Live free or die: Death is not the worst of evils.


Offline -MAD- SARGE

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant General
  • *****
  • Posts: 3279
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #18 on: September 11, 2006, 06:16:48 PM »
To the AK?? I dont see that one, I always thought the STG-44 was the predecessor to the AK-47...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by -MAD- SARGE »


Don't be an Escalefter.

Offline Vince

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • General
  • *****
  • Posts: 5230
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #19 on: September 11, 2006, 06:19:27 PM »
I believe the AK-47's bolt and the method in which it locks up to the barrel is derived from the M1, they just reposition the oprod.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Vince »


"I was having dinner with Andrew Ho, and he said I should have COL McKnight lead airsofters in mock combat. I said, "That is the gayest idea I have ever heard." - John Lu

Offline Raith

  • Wait, what?
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2289
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #20 on: September 11, 2006, 06:28:22 PM »
Quote from: "-MAD- SARGE"
To the AK?? I dont see that one, I always thought the STG-44 was the predecessor to the AK-47...


The manufacturing method is similar to the Stg44.  The trigger, bolt/barrel interface, and rails that the "bolt carrier" moves on is derived from the Garand.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Raith »
Live free or die: Death is not the worst of evils.


Offline B00MINATOR

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant First Class
  • *****
  • Posts: 338
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #21 on: September 11, 2006, 08:26:14 PM »
Quote from: "delta_echo"
Oh, and yes the garand was the predecessor to the M14.


Ahh thankyou. That answered my question.
I just needed to know if they were "related."

-B00M!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by B00MINATOR »
Quote from: \"Winston Churchill\"
We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what we give.

Offline Gantaliano Hoff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Brigadier General
  • *****
  • Posts: 1531
    • View Profile
    • http://www.amsog.com
(No subject)
« Reply #22 on: September 11, 2006, 08:56:36 PM »
My rifle is a Rock Island Arsenal rebuild, one of the batch that they rebuilt immediately postwar ('47 dated barrel, RIA rebuild proof marks).   It has various manufacturer's parts (HRA trigger housing, early WRA op rod, etc.), so I suspect that it's been rebuilt since then.  Dec. '43 production receiver, SN 2251XXX.  Another neat feature is a gas piston cut, just below the front sight, which was of course modified to create a tighter fit around the barrel.  Muzzle wear= 1, Throat erosion= 2.5  

BUT IT'S AN M1, WHAT DO I CARE???!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Gantaliano Hoff »

Offline MP5 NOOB

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Corporal
  • ****
  • Posts: 69
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #23 on: October 06, 2006, 01:06:47 PM »
A guy at a gunshow was selling CMP M1's with WW2 barrels for $800.
« Last Edit: October 06, 2006, 01:10:01 PM by MP5 NOOB »

Offline Ares

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1146
    • View Profile
    • http://www.myspace.com/gtm2000
(No subject)
« Reply #24 on: October 06, 2006, 01:51:36 PM »
jealousy...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Ares »