Xavier, I hate to bring this all up but...
We are not the police. We have a news report to go on, and as Blade asks us to realize, that is ALL we have to go on. The media is failing to give doubt of mind to the incident clearly, even if they have no evidence to back themselves up.
That said, your analysis of a media's relation of a crime is merely one slice of objective pie. Home invaders are not commonly trained killers. They are petty thieves and addicts. They don't go into a house with people in it with clear foresight. What they end up doing instead of robbing a house when they find people inside completely changes.
I saw this personally as one of my neighbors from where I moved from (Cheshire, CT), had their house invaded, two daughters raped and burned alive, mother killed, and father beaten and left for dead before the two criminals (both only with priors in minor theft), burned the house to the ground, stole their car, and tried to kill responding police officers. It was a mess, and people pointed a finger at the surviving father, who jumped out of a second story window barely clinging to life after watching his whole family raped and murdered, even as the police had arrested the two trying to ram and kill the police officers.
The media had tried to turn the story immediately into the flavor of the year: Normal father kills family. And they were more than wrong. Most of us held our judgement until the actual news came out.
Does this mean he is innocent? Of course not, but the similarities of media response are all too painfully clear.
I have to side with Blade here and ask that we pay respect to the due process of the law, not the speculation of the media. We can play CSI all day, but in the end we are just satiating our own desire to speculate on a tragedy.