Of course this is true, guys...but this is exactly my point. Why force further definition towards airsoft legislation, which would certainly be more stringent and restrictive, when we enjoy a pretty good setup right now? I agree that leaving things open for interpretation has led to many follies in the past, but in this case it would be best if airsoft was left alone. The intent is CLEAR. Crystal clear. And if you read any of the labels on airsoft boxes, or read the text of almost all mail order airsoft sites, they state that airsoft guns are not legal for minors to buy. Higher-powered airguns, with airsoft now falls under, are not for the purchase of minors. Why not enforce, amongst ourselves, the intent of this law so that further attention is at least less likely to come our way? If the intent is to keep minors out, does anyone here honestly believe that a law would say any different? Or worse, that a law would stop there? The easiest way to kill airsoft is to put in place an importation ban. Don't kid yourselves by thinking that would be hard for them to pass. It requires a signature on a piece of paper, and they'd love to sign it. Cops would support it, neighborhood groups would support it, and Libs everywhere would endorse it openly. It would never be made important enough to go to a public vote. Keep kids out now, as the intent directs. Just do it, and stop debating it. If we encourage further attention we may as well sell off our stuff...or in my case, sell it off again.