Unfortunately I heard the word "referee" being mentioned when a new airsoft establishment was being discussed. The consensus seemed to be that it'll be a cold day in hell before referees in airsoft games at least up here will become the norm. So how do you propose that the silent majority engages this problem of cheaters without having to resort to referees?
I know that most game organizers will probably have a chat with the offending individual regarding their behavior and that further examples of the offending behavior will be cause for a ban from future games. But I've seen that in the culture of airsoft it seems to have become an unwritten rule that if someone is being an obvious cheater and not calling their hits, that this kind of retaliation is expected. I've seen what happens when you have an offender who consistently engages in cheating and very little is done to discourage their behavior, they become used to it and indeed more brazen, even after numerous chats from various people. Outside of this unwritten rule, how do you deal with someone like this who does not respond to intervention from game organizers or even bans?
Why is the "referee" notion considered bad to most veteran airsofters? Trust.....
The inherent problem with airsoft is you rely on
trusting other people. It's been made obvious through paintball you can not trust people, that are marked, to be honest. Airsoft's basic tenant is trusting people will be honest. So, by allowing refs you acknowledge airsofters are no better than paintballers and can not be trusted. The problem is, airsofters already don't trust most newer players given large numbers of them
are paintballers jumping ship for either monetary or attitude reasons. Adding refs would just be the final nail in the coffin for the honor of the game.
There is also the problem of compromising. Compromising is terrible, you allow the best of two things to be made into 1 mediocre that can't compete. Any merging of paintball style games/organization in airsoft does this and vice verse. So don't.
Would you really have a problem at a paid to play field if a referee
only ref'd when a problem person was apparent with no knowledge you were being watched. Isn't that what game organizers do now? The only difference is they can legally BAN them from the business for breaking the rules.
Traditions are notorious playgrounds for foul play and manipulation. I have no respect for traditions if they simple promote problems. Do I really need to say how sh*tty most airsofters accuracy is originally? Really so when partnered with windage, off center sights, hopup issues, BB deformities, and the like? Since when have biased opinions become facts to judge others?
I imagine the same as now. I haven't seen many teams posting open games, and the amount of games over the past few years as dropped drastically. If you control the flow of information to only trusted people, there isn't any reason to cater cheaters. Have a ruined game, but find a few good people, invite them to private games. So you have 1 bad game to get several good games. Then keep repeating the process as desired.