« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Oakley has issues...  (Read 2580 times)

Offline busta_cap

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant General
  • *****
  • Posts: 3887
    • View Profile
Oakley has issues...
« on: February 13, 2005, 01:10:54 PM »
Yeah I found these about a month ago when fumbling around Oakleys website. Im sure most of you have seen them..But GOSH are they ugly. I think I would have to shoot myself before wearing these suckers: http://oakley.com/catalog/eyewear/thump/
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by busta_cap »
Logged

Offline RickEJ6

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • First Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 473
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2005, 01:14:44 PM »
Those look relatively tame compared to these....

http://oakley.com/catalog/colors/eyewea ... e_iridium/
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by RickEJ6 »
Logged
\"Do not hit if it can be avoided, but never hit softly.\"

T. Roosevelt

Offline azsarge

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • General
  • *****
  • Posts: 9999
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2005, 01:17:22 PM »
Then don't buy them!  :lol:

Oakley really has some cool technology incorporated in the products.  Their optics and frame materials are second to none!

While I am an Oakley customer, I do find alot (ok, MOST) of their stuff to be quite obnoxious, but that draws some people to it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by azsarge »
Logged

Offline RickEJ6

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • First Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 473
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2005, 01:42:08 PM »
Ive loved every pair of oakleys Ive ever had/lost (which seems to be every pair)  They are really unparalled w/ the quality and balistic protection. Rick
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by RickEJ6 »
Logged
\"Do not hit if it can be avoided, but never hit softly.\"

T. Roosevelt

Offline Greg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1381
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2005, 03:28:04 PM »
Even this guy's homemade thumps are better looking.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Greg »
Logged
-Greg of Christian\'s Team

Offline busta_cap

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant General
  • *****
  • Posts: 3887
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #5 on: February 13, 2005, 03:44:19 PM »
Damn  that guy is a Mac-A-Holic.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by busta_cap »
Logged

Offline Greg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1381
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #6 on: February 13, 2005, 04:30:26 PM »
Quote from: "busta_cap"
Damn  that guy is a Mac-A-Holic.
If you look at his other pictures, it would appear that his company just has a lot of mac stuff.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Greg »
Logged
-Greg of Christian\'s Team

Offline yellowmonkey

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant Major
  • *****
  • Posts: 608
    • View Profile
    • http://www.ratemykitten.com
(No subject)
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2005, 06:29:34 AM »
Quote from: "RickEJ6"
Those look relatively tame compared to these....

http://oakley.com/catalog/colors/eyewea ... e_iridium/


I could wear those if I had a shaved head with a big tattoo on my forehead.  :shock:

It might scare off the ladies, however.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by yellowmonkey »
Logged
It\'s time to kick *** and chew bubblegum, and I\'m all outa\' bubblegum. -Duke Nukem

Let\'s just be friends. -My Ex-girlfriend

Offline studdermonkey

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Brigadier General
  • *****
  • Posts: 1733
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2005, 01:12:07 PM »
(Quoting Ricks link)
http://oakley.com/catalog/colors/eyewea ... e_iridium/

Werent those in some movie? Or something like it?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by studdermonkey »
Logged
كافر
Nate!

Offline azsarge

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • General
  • *****
  • Posts: 9999
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #9 on: February 14, 2005, 01:19:31 PM »
Quote from: "studdermonkey"
(Quoting Ricks link)
http://oakley.com/catalog/colors/eyewea ... e_iridium/

Werent those in some movie? Or something like it?


Yes.  Dennis Rodman wore them in some lame action flick, that I never bothered seeing.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by azsarge »
Logged

Offline Firehead

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #10 on: February 14, 2005, 01:48:11 PM »
lol @ azsarge.

Looks like something from Riddick.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Firehead »
Logged

Offline HavHav

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1474
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #11 on: February 14, 2005, 01:55:46 PM »
If anyone is going for the 'retarded guy with a gun' look, those glasses would be perfect!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by HavHav »
Logged

Offline TimW

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • First Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 475
    • View Profile
    • http://www.practicaltactical.net
(No subject)
« Reply #12 on: February 14, 2005, 06:22:45 PM »
HavHav, wasn't that you I saw wearing these while you were working that street corner? :)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by TimW »
Logged
TimW
Phoenix

Practical Tactical Tough Life. Tougher Gear.  Assaultvest.com

Offline HavHav

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1474
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #13 on: February 14, 2005, 06:25:06 PM »
Yeah. I get so many customers with those things..

Oh, speaking of customers, your wife said she will be home with a new package of diapers for you to wear to bed tonight.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by HavHav »
Logged

Offline TimW

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • First Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 475
    • View Profile
    • http://www.practicaltactical.net
(No subject)
« Reply #14 on: February 14, 2005, 06:41:29 PM »
LOL
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by TimW »
Logged
TimW
Phoenix

Practical Tactical Tough Life. Tougher Gear.  Assaultvest.com
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »