It's like the difference between a prior-enlisted 1LT, and one that's fresh from ROTC. :?
So how bad are the college boys compared to the mustangs, is the disparaity in terms of quality enough to make you think twice about working with one?
I will never NOT work with someone in the military unless my life or limb are at risk.
That said, consider this. Prior enlisted officers have been enlisted, and some have even deployed as enlisted. They are familiar with the advantages and shortcomings of each paygrade, and know what to expect. They know how to lead, because they've been a follower.
However, even though ROTC-grad LTs are new to the game, most have been to the same "hooah!" schools (airborne, air assault, etc), and there is much to be said for the ROTC curriculum.
I won't say I "respect" the BTDT enlisted-turned-officers more than the cheery-ass LTs, but there is something about them that seems to make for a better leader on the average.
Now, my CO was enlisted, then turned Warrant, then got a direct comission. He's a 1LT, but knows more about how rank structure works and what to expect from everyone than most O-4s.
Shit, the AZ Adjutant General was enlisted, Warrant, and got a Combat Comission in Vietnam. He's been "all 3", and he knows his shit.
So, that's the long answer.
Oh, I forgot to mention the simultaneous membership program. It is where ROTC cadets serve as enlisted during college in the state National Guard. They also make for some very informed, well-rounded leaders.
