« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 74

Author Topic: Weapon Photos Discussion  (Read 572691 times)

Offline babybackribs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Second Lieutenant
  • *****
  • Posts: 763
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #435 on: September 21, 2006, 03:10:31 PM »
Not if you put a crane stock on it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by babybackribs »
Logged

Religion is a joke.

Offline Cheeze_IZ_G00d

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Second Lieutenant
  • *****
  • Posts: 795
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #436 on: September 21, 2006, 03:11:49 PM »
Quote from: "pilz"
thats a cool ak, you should get a m4 stock for it.


Why?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Cheeze_IZ_G00d »
Logged
Visit my website -
http://www.iwantafreedollarnow.com!!!

Get great ringtones here!

Offline PolandsLeftTesticle

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant Major
  • *****
  • Posts: 533
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #437 on: September 21, 2006, 03:13:58 PM »
- The M4 stock would better match what you've got on the gun, but I agree with ya, Seph, it wouldn't feel right. I bet'cha know that G&G AK-74 stocks are extra-long for 9.6v battery storage, if you're looking for a bigger upgrade.

\PLT
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by PolandsLeftTesticle »
Logged
Quote from: \"SHIHAN\"
I never knew that three inches was the minimum length for a handgun barrel. I guess all of the anti-gun politicians wont be able to register their penises.

Offline seph6885

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Staff Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 218
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #438 on: September 21, 2006, 05:03:14 PM »
Quote from: "PolandsLeftTesticle"
- The M4 stock would better match what you've got on the gun\PLT


if you're referring to this useless rail thing i have, thats what came with the gun, i didnt put it on there willingly. i think its pretty stupid.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by seph6885 »
Logged

after throwing a man through a window..
newsreporter: \"is there anything you regret about what you did?\"
charles: \"yea, i regret we weren\'t on a higher floor\"

Offline babybackribs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Second Lieutenant
  • *****
  • Posts: 763
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #439 on: September 21, 2006, 10:45:37 PM »
Did you get it used?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by babybackribs »
Logged

Religion is a joke.

Offline alex

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 147
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #440 on: September 25, 2006, 02:39:09 PM »
Rocketboy, is there an advantage to having the rear sight on your HK416 on backwards?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by alex »
Logged

Offline pilz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1350
    • View Profile
    • http://AMSOG.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #441 on: September 25, 2006, 03:20:52 PM »
Quote from: "alex"
Rocketboy, is there an advantage to having the rear sight on your HK416 on backwards?

I think there is in some way, or why would he have it that way, unless he put it on wrong.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by pilz »
Logged
No longer airsofts... what a shame.

Offline babybackribs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Second Lieutenant
  • *****
  • Posts: 763
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #442 on: September 25, 2006, 05:10:32 PM »
Elbows, what kind of L85 is that?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by babybackribs »
Logged

Religion is a joke.

Offline Elbows

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Corporal
  • ****
  • Posts: 70
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #443 on: September 25, 2006, 10:10:52 PM »
Dunno where my post went...but its the GG model.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Elbows »
Logged
Member, 1st N.C.

Offline babybackribs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Second Lieutenant
  • *****
  • Posts: 763
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #444 on: October 05, 2006, 10:12:24 PM »
Hey Bow-Tie, what's with the white tape?  And how's the STAR working out?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by babybackribs »
Logged

Religion is a joke.

Offline Bow-tie Assasin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant Major
  • *****
  • Posts: 501
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #445 on: October 05, 2006, 10:15:20 PM »
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Hey Bow-Tie, what's with the white tape?  And how's the STAR working out?


The tape is to prevent the lid of the box mag from popping off and bb's spilling all over. The tape on the grip is to keep it secure because it's a VERY cheap plasticy grip. The gun itself feels nice for plastic though and it works great.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Bow-tie Assasin »
Logged
"First There"
Never Quit!

Offline Ares

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1146
    • View Profile
    • http://www.myspace.com/gtm2000
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #446 on: October 09, 2006, 12:55:56 PM »
just put some up. you all know what the weapon on the bottom is, but the top one is weird. CA gearbox, SRC outter barrel, TM body and stock, Delta gears. its a mess.

on the CQ, i put a G&P red dot in the riser i got. put what used to be in that riser on the mutt. textured rail covers and the UTG fore grip. all i need nor the CQ is a sling, mags, and battery, and tight bore.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Ares »
Logged

Offline Vince

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • General
  • *****
  • Posts: 5230
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #447 on: October 09, 2006, 01:02:30 PM »
Grayson, did you for some reason flip that picture in Photoshop?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Vince »
Logged


"I was having dinner with Andrew Ho, and he said I should have COL McKnight lead airsofters in mock combat. I said, "That is the gayest idea I have ever heard." - John Lu

Offline Ares

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1146
    • View Profile
    • http://www.myspace.com/gtm2000
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #448 on: October 09, 2006, 01:08:49 PM »
oh.. no, thats the cameras fault. its built into my computer and for some reason it leaves the pic mirrored

((all fixed))
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Ares »
Logged

Offline Fish

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Second Lieutenant
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #449 on: November 01, 2006, 06:17:04 PM »



Jesus! You need to go to the red-alliance...
http://www.red-alliance.net/phpBB2/view ... light=ugly

EDIT: Hey, I don't want to sound like a d!ck. It's just that a wood kit would have been a much better choice. AKs weren't made to look like that. It's not realistic. That looks like a cross between an M4 and an AK. To me, it looks wrong, a "tactical" AK  :?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Fish »
Logged
\"If at first you don\'t succeed, skydiving definitely is not for you. \"
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 74
« previous next »