Author Topic: Weapon Photos Discussion  (Read 572680 times)

Offline RangerBob

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 187
    • View Profile
    • http://photobucket.com/albums/c48/rikki185/?sc=4
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #510 on: February 08, 2007, 07:32:26 PM »
That's a power cord for a laptop I'm pretty certain, I know it's nothing for the gun.  It also disappears behind the cabinet there in the corner presumably to a wall outlet.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by RangerBob »
A team kill is still a kill.....

Offline -MAD- SARGE

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant General
  • *****
  • Posts: 3279
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #511 on: February 08, 2007, 10:59:16 PM »
Na, he's just charging his 480volt 100,000 mah battery that is required to run that thing.  Surprisingly, such a small cord can provide enough juice to charge that up in a timely manner.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by -MAD- SARGE »


Don't be an Escalefter.

Offline babybackribs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Second Lieutenant
  • *****
  • Posts: 763
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #512 on: February 08, 2007, 11:19:50 PM »
Quote from: "-MAD- SARGE"
Na, he's just charging his 480volt 100,000 mah battery that is required to run that thing.  Surprisingly, such a small cord can provide enough juice to charge that up in a timely manner.

For some reason, I was under the assumption that those things ran on bullets.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by babybackribs »

Religion is a joke.

Offline Ares

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1146
    • View Profile
    • http://www.myspace.com/gtm2000
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #513 on: February 09, 2007, 12:27:22 AM »
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Quote from: "-MAD- SARGE"
Na, he's just charging his 480volt 100,000 mah battery that is required to run that thing.  Surprisingly, such a small cord can provide enough juice to charge that up in a timely manner.
For some reason, I was under the assumption that those things ran on bullets.


psh lame.... he should have at least 520V 250,000MAH
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Ares »

Offline Wolfan8or

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 173
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #514 on: February 09, 2007, 07:57:37 PM »
i didnt know if the anpeq had to be charged or w/e, i agree, stupid question, how n00bish of me
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Wolfan8or »

Greenmarine

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #515 on: February 20, 2007, 01:08:13 PM »
how long have you guys been messing with you guns to get them like that :?:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Greenmarine »

Offline skate n shoot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 150
    • View Profile
    • http://www.myspace.com/skatenshoot
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #516 on: February 20, 2007, 02:39:22 PM »
Quote from: "Greenmarine"
how long have you guys been messing with you guns to get them like that :?:


not that long, for me its been a couple months cause i have to work crap jobs to get the money but others it may be longer or shorter
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by skate n shoot »
primary - classic army m15a4 tatical carbine
secondary - kwa g26 c

Offline pilz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1350
    • View Profile
    • http://AMSOG.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #517 on: February 20, 2007, 03:49:42 PM »
Quote from: "Greenmarine"
how long have you guys been messing with you guns to get them like that :?:

A month or 2, depeding on if the items I need are instock, and depending on if somthing breaks.... Its all good none of the acessories are needed, but they make it look "tacticool" [tac-ty-cool].
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by pilz »
No longer airsofts... what a shame.

Offline babybackribs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Second Lieutenant
  • *****
  • Posts: 763
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #518 on: February 22, 2007, 10:02:48 PM »
Pilz, you need to get rid of the rear BUIS.  It has no purpose.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by babybackribs »

Religion is a joke.

Offline pilz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1350
    • View Profile
    • http://AMSOG.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #519 on: February 22, 2007, 10:12:07 PM »
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Pilz, you need to get rid of the rear BUIS.  It has no purpose.

But I like it.. It looks awkward with just an aimpoint in my opinion.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by pilz »
No longer airsofts... what a shame.

Offline -MAD- SARGE

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant General
  • *****
  • Posts: 3279
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #520 on: February 23, 2007, 08:47:32 AM »
Ah kids rationalizations, you got to love it!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by -MAD- SARGE »


Don't be an Escalefter.

Offline AddoAduro

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Master Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 353
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #521 on: February 23, 2007, 10:29:17 AM »
Hey, you've gotta consider the looks too...  I don't want to be running around with an ugly gun... Like a Famas. lol
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by AddoAduro »
Quote from: \"XavierMace\"
Every day I have to wade through mountains of stupid posts on forums by kids who feel it necessary to share their personal life on the internet like they think we care.

Offline XavierMace

  • Site Admin
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2906
    • View Profile
    • http://www.xaviermace.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #522 on: February 23, 2007, 12:58:03 PM »
If you want to see an ugly FAMAS, go to ASR.  You got the classics, like a home made RIS, carry handle scope mount, and a FAMAS with a G36c handle.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by XavierMace »

Offline -MAD- SARGE

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant General
  • *****
  • Posts: 3279
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #523 on: February 23, 2007, 04:22:52 PM »
I want functionality first. If it looks cool, that is a distant second. For the most part, things that are very useful and have real use are usually "cool" anyways.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by -MAD- SARGE »


Don't be an Escalefter.

Offline B00MINATOR

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant First Class
  • *****
  • Posts: 338
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #524 on: February 28, 2007, 09:58:06 PM »
Wow.
Tokyo Marui Car-15!
Those are nearly impossible to find now-a-days.

Nice little rarity you have there.

I wonder if he was able to find the Sig 550 or 551 over there.

-Brian
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by B00MINATOR »
Quote from: \"Winston Churchill\"
We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what we give.