Author Topic: Weapon Photos Discussion  (Read 575067 times)

Offline studdermonkey

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Brigadier General
  • *****
  • Posts: 1733
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #570 on: April 06, 2007, 02:48:57 PM »
Quote from: "Speedy"
Guys.......
Who gives a flying **** where your from, how you bought your guns or what guns you own and the price and all that s***. Lets just play this sport aight guys.
And yes you have very nice modest set up going there i will give you that, but quit doggin on people and play the damn sport.


Are you saying this because you live in Tucson?


All this makes me miss my CQBR.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by studdermonkey »
كافر
Nate!

Offline Farslayer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2103
    • View Profile
    • http://www.amsog.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #571 on: April 06, 2007, 02:53:30 PM »
Quote from: "-MAD- SARGE"
Why put an external tank on a bolt action rifle? Can't possibly tell me that your going to shoot that much.
to be honest, that thing looks sick....I hope it works as good as it looks.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Farslayer »
Benn

Offline Speedy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 170
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #572 on: April 06, 2007, 10:11:24 PM »
Like i said.......Doesn't matter where your from.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Speedy »
Check out Albuquerque, New Mexico\'s first indoor Airsoft Arena here http://abqairsoft.com/index.html

Offline Trashcan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Staff Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 224
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #573 on: April 07, 2007, 06:56:12 AM »
Quote from: "nosmo"
Got myself a Marui Socom 16
 :)

[/img]


What are your thoughts on this gun? All I've read so far has been good... any immediate negatives I should know about?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Trashcan »

Offline Cheeze_IZ_G00d

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Second Lieutenant
  • *****
  • Posts: 795
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #574 on: April 07, 2007, 08:13:44 AM »
Quote from: "Trashcan"
Quote from: "nosmo"
Got myself a Marui Socom 16
 :)

[/img]

What are your thoughts on this gun? All I've read so far has been good... any immediate negatives I should know about?


How about that couch? :P

From what I understand, the Soc 16 is some of the finest that Marui has produced, which says a lot since Marui was great to begin with.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Cheeze_IZ_G00d »
Visit my website -
http://www.iwantafreedollarnow.com!!!

Get great ringtones here!

Offline nosmo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant First Class
  • *****
  • Posts: 340
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #575 on: April 07, 2007, 10:07:23 AM »
It was the best stock gun that I've ever owned.  I've got an M100 in it now with a Prometheus tight bore and I'm more than impressed.

I would recommend the couch too Shane  :lol:


There aren't really any immediate negatives other than there aren't that many basic internal components available as of now, but that will probably change.  Just be REALLY careful when you take it apart because this thing called the selector arm is relatively fragile.

And if you have issues ordering overseas, some people do, you won't be able to buy upgrade parts for it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by nosmo »

Offline pilz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1350
    • View Profile
    • http://AMSOG.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #576 on: April 07, 2007, 05:02:30 PM »
Quote from: "nosmo"
It was the best stock gun that I've ever owned.  I've got an M100 in it now with a Prometheus tight bore and I'm more than impressed.

I would recommend the couch too Shane  :lol:


There aren't really any immediate negatives other than there aren't that many basic internal components available as of now, but that will probably change.  Just be REALLY careful when you take it apart because this thing called the selector arm is relatively fragile.

And if you have issues ordering overseas, some people do, you won't be able to buy upgrade parts for it.

I can't wait until I get mine in the nest week or so. I will replace the selector arm since they make the metal one but its $38. So if it breaks there is not choice really.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by pilz »
No longer airsofts... what a shame.

Offline Trashcan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Staff Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 224
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #577 on: April 07, 2007, 05:16:15 PM »
It wont be in the next week, but I can definitely see one of those in my future.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Trashcan »

Offline m4J

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Corporal
  • ****
  • Posts: 89
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #578 on: April 14, 2007, 01:15:59 AM »
I heard the finish isn't to good on the soc 16, is there any truth to this?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by m4J »

Offline Vince

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • General
  • *****
  • Posts: 5230
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #579 on: April 14, 2007, 01:20:11 AM »
Well, that's a pretty broad stroke, there.

The finish on the receiver is top notch, until it gets wet. Then you're fairly fucked.

The finish on the stock is decent, but it achieves it's color on both the green and black stocks by way of a clear coat over a base coat, and the clear coat can get scratched off after awhile, creating a non-uniform appearance.

Easy solution -- paint that bitch.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Vince »


"I was having dinner with Andrew Ho, and he said I should have COL McKnight lead airsofters in mock combat. I said, "That is the gayest idea I have ever heard." - John Lu

Offline nosmo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant First Class
  • *****
  • Posts: 340
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #580 on: April 14, 2007, 12:06:55 PM »
The finish on it before i painted it wasn't too bad.  It's called "sand stone" finish or something like that.  Anywho, I painted mine in khaki with krylon paint and it's much better like Vince said.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by nosmo »

Offline -MAD- SARGE

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant General
  • *****
  • Posts: 3279
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #581 on: April 15, 2007, 09:25:20 PM »
Ah, well I see Vince has christened it already  :)

How does this one, with a second regulator, compare to the other setup/gun you had?  And Im gona have to shoot it a bit : )
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by -MAD- SARGE »


Don't be an Escalefter.

Offline pilz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1350
    • View Profile
    • http://AMSOG.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #582 on: April 15, 2007, 10:19:41 PM »
Hey Vince is that a Escort mp5?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by pilz »
No longer airsofts... what a shame.

Offline Vince

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • General
  • *****
  • Posts: 5230
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #583 on: April 15, 2007, 10:20:42 PM »
Yes. Escort MP5A4.

I built it the week before last.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Vince »


"I was having dinner with Andrew Ho, and he said I should have COL McKnight lead airsofters in mock combat. I said, "That is the gayest idea I have ever heard." - John Lu

Offline pilz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1350
    • View Profile
    • http://AMSOG.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #584 on: April 15, 2007, 10:26:15 PM »
Didn't you also have a Escort mp5 last year for LCV?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by pilz »
No longer airsofts... what a shame.