« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 62 63 [64] 65 66 ... 74

Author Topic: Weapon Photos Discussion  (Read 568313 times)

Offline Exarach

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Brigadier General
  • *****
  • Posts: 1769
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #945 on: January 26, 2009, 08:01:20 PM »
Quote from: "eggman998"
damn you beat me to it  :-({|=
+1
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
\"Friendly fire isn\'t\"
If a speeding pellet in a quiet woods hits a noob in the face, and he cries, does anyone care?

Offline Rogue Fox

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • First Lieutenant
  • *****
  • Posts: 891
  • 6CA
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #946 on: January 26, 2009, 10:16:19 PM »
My last post on this subject, but I think Ive actually wasted the least amount of time on this issue out of everyone that has responded to it.. ](*,)

Now, back to discussing the weapon photos mabey?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

When the shit hits the fan, dont be in front of the fan.

Offline tastyfish21

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Staff Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 200
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #947 on: January 26, 2009, 10:18:58 PM »
I don't have a problem someone calling me on something I said that was stupid. Hell, I say a lot of stupid stuff. But don't "point out" someones errors that aren't errors. Thanks to oldgamefreak for sticking up for me though. Much obliged. I normally wouldn't care about an internet argument, but I didn't feel as if I said anything incorrectly. And I didn't admit to using the wrong term. I of all people should know sarcasm doesn't translate well into forums.

Anyhow.... Oldgamefreak, I got my wood stock and fore arm today. I'm not gonna have a chance to get to it until this weekend. You might get a call from me with questions if I get a little lost on the project.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
-SteveO

Offline Rogue Fox

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • First Lieutenant
  • *****
  • Posts: 891
  • 6CA
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #948 on: January 26, 2009, 10:32:34 PM »
I realize I am contradicting my last post by posting on this matter again, but I belive in settling things instead of leaving issues un resolved.

If/since I am indeed wrong about forearm being the wrong term for that section of the rifle I apologize for making the faulty corrections, I've just never heard of that part being called a forearm, Ive always known it as a forend or foregrip[plus in my mind the term forearm just doesnt seem to describe the part right, even if you are reffering to the rifle as body parts who the heck holds thier forearm?]

anyway, my apologies, I guess its just one of those terms like tomatoe/tomato and potatoe/potato, the terms are interchangeable but everyone has thier own opinion.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

When the shit hits the fan, dont be in front of the fan.

Offline tastyfish21

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Staff Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 200
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #949 on: January 27, 2009, 10:18:56 AM »
No worries man.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
-SteveO

Offline XavierMace

  • Site Admin
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2906
    • View Profile
    • http://www.xaviermace.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #950 on: February 22, 2009, 10:58:58 PM »
Matt, don't blame me for getting the FNC.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Raith

  • Wait, what?
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2289
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #951 on: March 11, 2009, 10:55:12 PM »
Boles,

Your MK46 looks good.  Do you like the TD Bipod?  I was thinking of getting one for my 240.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Live free or die: Death is not the worst of evils.

Offline Boles

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 139
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #952 on: March 12, 2009, 08:23:52 AM »
Thanks  I do like it alot but my only issue with it is when you want to drop it down in a hurry you have to do both sides instead of one motion like a normal bipod.  And its actually the King arms version I thought about just getting the Cheapo from China on Ebaybanned but paid the extra doh for the king arms one.  its a real nice light weight bipod
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline saw gunner clayton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Corporal
  • ****
  • Posts: 79
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #953 on: March 31, 2009, 09:04:21 PM »
hell, your mk46 is better than lugging around my metal brick m249.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged



Offline Bully Dog Airsoft

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Master Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 421
    • View Profile
    • http://www.bullydogairsoftgrenades.webs.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #954 on: April 27, 2009, 11:17:45 AM »
[smilie=armata_pdt_06.gif]
« Last Edit: June 06, 2009, 01:27:01 AM by Bully Dog Airsoft »
Logged
Image Hosting
                        [size=150]Keny BDAS 2011 Gunman/EOD[/size]

Maddsurf

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #955 on: June 06, 2009, 01:14:28 AM »
Quote from: "Bully Dog Airsoft"
Hey guys... Do you think that this D-Boys Scar is a reasonable gun??? Just asking because I was thinking of buying it.

http://www.hitguns.com/DBoy-SCAR-L-Full-Metal-Tan-p/bi-sc01-scar-tan.htm


Wrong thread!!

Bizkitcan that gat is sick man!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline deathbydanish

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Brigadier General
  • *****
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #956 on: June 17, 2009, 11:10:21 AM »
Nice Celcius Vince, what are you initial impressions of it?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Saguaro Airsoft Team

The quietest move is the most efficient one.

Offline Raith

  • Wait, what?
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2289
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #957 on: June 17, 2009, 09:26:07 PM »
SAWs without stocks and are gay.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Live free or die: Death is not the worst of evils.

Offline azsarge

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • General
  • *****
  • Posts: 9999
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #958 on: June 17, 2009, 09:45:49 PM »
Boles, it is accurate for a Mk46 to have a Para SAW barrel, but there is no way it would fit past the rail without cutting off the carry handle.  It's a slight mod some guys do with their real Mk46s.

Vince, that's some funny ish bro.

I'll have to post pics of my Real Sword "LT Recce Rifle" and Kim Jong "SEAL18 Mod 1" one of these days.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Sergeant First Class Keenan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant Major
  • *****
  • Posts: 588
  • AZ Army National Guard - "Protecting What Matters"
    • View Profile
    • Arizona Army National Guard
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #959 on: June 17, 2009, 09:46:47 PM »
yeah but un-painted stocks are gayer.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Sergeant First Class Keenan
Marketing & Advertising Manager
AZ Army National Guard
Cell: (602) 377-6322
Pages: 1 ... 62 63 [64] 65 66 ... 74
« previous next »