« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 74

Author Topic: Weapon Photos Discussion  (Read 572629 times)

Offline AddoAduro

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Master Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 353
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #225 on: July 08, 2006, 04:20:21 AM »
Is that....  No, it can't be...  Is that a Maruzen MP5-K?  If it is, I'd be your servant for life if you'd give me some or all of those mags. :D

And azmjs, do I detect a hint of sarcasm? ;)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by AddoAduro »
Logged
Quote from: \"XavierMace\"
Every day I have to wade through mountains of stupid posts on forums by kids who feel it necessary to share their personal life on the internet like they think we care.

Offline Kurn

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant Major
  • *****
  • Posts: 647
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #226 on: July 08, 2006, 04:29:31 AM »
Looks like an AEG to me.  Don't the Maruzens have a hollow pistol grip?

pilz, how did you mount that m4 stock?  It looks like a neat setup.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Kurn »
Logged
Not dead yet.

Offline pilz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1350
    • View Profile
    • http://AMSOG.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #227 on: July 08, 2006, 12:30:36 PM »
Quote from: "Kurn"
Looks like an AEG to me.  Don't the Maruzens have a hollow pistol grip?

pilz, how did you mount that m4 stock?  It looks like a neat setup.


Its a Tm Mp5k. The m4 stock was put on by a friend but i know how to take it off and how it works, First you have to take the buttplate off and take out the sling mount there should be a little washer thing that holds the sling mount in, its hard to get off but it comes off. The you take a M4 stock with the stock screw and you stick the stock screw into the buttplate
then you put a nut on the end of it and tighten it. then thats how you get a m4 stock on a mp5k.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by pilz »
Logged
No longer airsofts... what a shame.

Offline GrimUSMC

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Corporal
  • ****
  • Posts: 78
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #228 on: July 08, 2006, 08:09:52 PM »
Nice AK but did you have to use an In 'n' Out burger for reference? Just looking at that juicy burger is making me hungry for a 4x4 with no cheese (yes i know it doesnt make it a 4x4 without the cheese )
*originally posted in wrong section my bad*
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by GrimUSMC »
Logged
Locate, Close With, Destroy

Offline PolandsLeftTesticle

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant Major
  • *****
  • Posts: 533
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #229 on: July 08, 2006, 08:11:18 PM »
N/p. Thanks for the comment--appreciate it much. I hope to get it upgraded once I finally get a real job, but it's nice just the way it is.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by PolandsLeftTesticle »
Logged
Quote from: \"SHIHAN\"
I never knew that three inches was the minimum length for a handgun barrel. I guess all of the anti-gun politicians wont be able to register their penises.

Offline pilz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1350
    • View Profile
    • http://AMSOG.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #230 on: July 12, 2006, 09:00:25 AM »
whats with liquidskies pic of his m4 with the bipod, tha background is blury and the gun isn't/ Did he photoshop it?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by pilz »
Logged
No longer airsofts... what a shame.

Offline Farslayer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2103
    • View Profile
    • http://www.amsog.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #231 on: July 12, 2006, 09:57:38 AM »
Quote from: "pilz"
whats with liquidskies pic of his m4 with the bipod, tha background is blury and the gun isn't/ Did he photoshop it?


Probably auto focus on his digital camera.  Macro setting will focus clearly on the foreground and blurr out the area farther away.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Farslayer »
Logged
Benn

Offline pilz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1350
    • View Profile
    • http://AMSOG.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #232 on: July 18, 2006, 08:31:33 PM »
nice type 89.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by pilz »
Logged
No longer airsofts... what a shame.

Offline seph6885

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Staff Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 218
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #233 on: July 18, 2006, 08:36:36 PM »
thanks. it really is a very nice gun. only problem is the stick battery. i'll have to get around that somehow.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by seph6885 »
Logged

after throwing a man through a window..
newsreporter: \"is there anything you regret about what you did?\"
charles: \"yea, i regret we weren\'t on a higher floor\"

Offline pilz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1350
    • View Profile
    • http://AMSOG.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #234 on: July 18, 2006, 08:53:45 PM »
hows the burst working out? and is it metal?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by pilz »
Logged
No longer airsofts... what a shame.

Offline seph6885

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Staff Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 218
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #235 on: July 19, 2006, 12:17:27 AM »
yes, it has a metal body. anything that is metal on the real steel is metal on this. the burst is great.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by seph6885 »
Logged

after throwing a man through a window..
newsreporter: \"is there anything you regret about what you did?\"
charles: \"yea, i regret we weren\'t on a higher floor\"

Offline Dust2Dust

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1357
    • View Profile
    • The SPHL
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #236 on: July 19, 2006, 12:39:20 AM »
So... you going to be at the game saturday?  I want to see this thing... then see if an Escort version would be possible ;)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Dust2Dust »
Logged

Offline seph6885

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Staff Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 218
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #237 on: July 19, 2006, 01:10:05 AM »
cant make it on the 22nd, but i'll bring it out on the 29th. might not be 'combat ready' by then though. im low on funds.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by seph6885 »
Logged

after throwing a man through a window..
newsreporter: \"is there anything you regret about what you did?\"
charles: \"yea, i regret we weren\'t on a higher floor\"

Offline babybackribs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Second Lieutenant
  • *****
  • Posts: 763
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #238 on: July 19, 2006, 01:39:35 PM »
Where does the battery go?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by babybackribs »
Logged

Religion is a joke.

Offline Vince

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • General
  • *****
  • Posts: 5230
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #239 on: July 19, 2006, 01:40:44 PM »
It's a stick, so I assume a dust cover of some sort is removed from the received.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Vince »
Logged


"I was having dinner with Andrew Ho, and he said I should have COL McKnight lead airsofters in mock combat. I said, "That is the gayest idea I have ever heard." - John Lu
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 74
« previous next »